Nobody has chosen where he was born? Wrong!

First some music

Today I read a comment on facebook claiming this: “My parents were humans, they lived in Austria and thus I was born here. Who of you has chosen WHERE HE/SHE wos born?”

The autor of this comment is obviously trying to bring over the message “All humans are the same.”

First of all it does not matter at all where you live, but who/what you are. Europeans, Asians and Africans are genetically different from each other. A child of two Asians is automatically also an Asian, it’s not like if there is a random chance of it to become Asian, African or European, so this does matter. If every African would mix with every European, there will be no Africans and Europeans left anymore, it is simply against nature.

The autor of this comment might now  counter something like: “Well, but you also did not chose to be born as European or Asian, so you cannot be proud to be European and it also does not matter anyway.”

And now I will explain why this is nonsense:

People are different and I mean now the very individuals. You are not me. But what defines who I am and who you are? Your first thought might be the conscious mind. But I am sure it is not so, if it would be so, it would mean that our identity is defined by the things whe have experienced, but this would mean that you become a different person every second you experience which is nonsense.

The next thing that might come into our mind is the physical body, but this will also turn out to be worng. Since our cells are renewed every once and then, so you have not a single cell of your body left from the time when you were born. Further everything consists of particles and there are different types of the smallest units of particles where all particles of one type are the same,  only at a different place in space, so we all consist of the same matter only in different combinations.

So maybe it is these combinations that make us different persons? And maybe especially the different combinations of different base pairs within the DNA of a gene? I am actually pretty sure that this is the thing that defines our identity. But wait! Haven’t we inherited our DNA from our parents? Yes we have! So basically we are our parents, since we have their DNA. This would explain two things. 1. It explains why we love our family more than some stranger guy passing us on the street. You might argue, that the real reason is, because we spend almost all of our time with them and also our first time in life, but this should then also count for school friends, colleagues at work etc., with whom you also spend most of your day. 2. It explains why humans and indeed all animals are procreating in the first place. Why would an animal procreate? It means effort. You have to find a spouse, you have to convince it to procreate with you and you have to care for the children. You have much better chances to survive longer, if you don’t take all this effort. BUT: If your children are basically you yourself, procreation means life prolonging, through procreation you suddenly have two bodies, the older one will die and the younger one will survive, which means that you are actually immortal. Yes, dear readers, we are immortal. You, who are reading this in this moment, have alraedy lived 100 years ago. You have also lived 500 years ago and 1,000 years ago and 10.000 years ago and even 500,000 years ago etc.

So, let us return to the original meaning of this post. We have not chosen where and as who/what we were born? Wrong! I am my parents, and 23 years ago I chose to get a child and I chose to get him (me) here in Austria.

And let us make it clear once and forever. People who are saying things like “What does it matter if there will be no whites in 100 years anymore? It’s just skin coulour, there will still be humans and we are all humans.”, people who say things like that should read this article and start to think. White people are white people because their ancestors where white, because they are there ancestors and we will (would?) be the ancestors of the white people in 100 years, because they are us and if they will not exist, we will have stopped to exist. And people who want other people to stop to exist (=to stop to live) want to kill them. The Hooton-plan, which is currently cast over the Europeans, is nothing but an attempted murder, an attempted genocide. White genocide.

When I say “Refugees not welcome.” I don’t mean “Refugees, I want you to die at war in Syria!”, I rather mean “Refugees, I don’t want you to come to Europe in masses and mix with us, so that we will be extinct soon (=we will die). I don’t hate you, but I also don’t hate me, which is the reason why I fight back the attempts to kill us by importing you into my land. If you don’t want to live in a war zone, then move away from it but stay at your continent and keep away from mine (=Europe).”

Using the same logic as these people you could also say things like: “What does it matter if all humans die? After all we are all just animals and there will still be other animals left, so what?”

It is simply total nonsense, but sadly something that is so skillful propagated by the media as the truth that the majority of us thinks so.

The picture says in German: “Germany 2030: Where are you from?”

May this article open the eyes of at least some intelligent people out there whose only problem in the past was, to have been fed with lie propaganda. (As it was the case with me too some 4 years ago or so).

Hail the gods!

 

My definition of the seasons – An alternative calendar

Some background music at the beginning

 

I have been thinking about our modern calendar a lot lately. It just does not really make sense to me. According to this calendar winter, spring, summer and autumn start at the respective solstices and equinoxes, but shouldn’t they be the centers of these seasons and not the beginnings? Shouldn’t the darkest day of the year be the middle of winter and not the beginning of it? If it was the beginning it means that the first month of winter is basically equal to the last one of autumn which doesn’t make sense at all, because winter is supposed to be darker/colder than Autumn.

Now it appears, that the answer to these questions is this: This modern calender does not orientate after the strength of the sun or the length of the days, but after the temperature. And it turns out, that the Ocean saves much of the coldness of winter and of the heat of summer and stays this warm/cold much longer than the air does and it actually also gives much of this heat/coldness back to the air after the air has already lost it. This means that the further you live near an Ocean the later it gets cold in winter and the later it gets warm in summer. This is the reason why the modern calendar simply pushes the seasons 1.5 months into the future. This might seem logical at first glance, but in my opinion it isn’t. How can we simply say that this delay in temperatur is exactly 1.5 months? Or how can we say that is everywhere 1.5 months? Remember, the further you live at an Ocean, the stronger is this effect. And even if it would everywhere be exactly 1.5 months, wouldn’t it still be odd to only orientate after temperature? The sun is still most powerful and the days are still the longest at the end of June and not at the beginning of August, even if the latter is usually hotter. It’s only hotter though, because of the heat saved by the ocean at the end of June and relaesed at the beginning of August.

Another strange thing that seems even much more logical at first glance is that all seasons have the same length in this modern calendar. Most of you will probably think now “Well, why should they not?” and I want to explain, why I think, they shouldn’t:

Winter is normally associated with darkness and coldness. Summer is associated with light and heat. Spring and autumn are both associated with moderateness of both mentioned aspecsts (light and temperature). So we have three different states: the dark and cold one, the moderate one, and the light and hot one. Have you noticed something? We have three states and not four. Every year has two moderate states (spring and autumn), so maybe we should divide the year into two halfs, a spring halfyear and an autumn halfyear. Each of these halfyears could be divided into three thirds: A dark and cold third (winter), a moderate third (spring/autumn) and a light and hot third (summer). This means that summer and winter are twice as long as spring and autumn, because they already represent a state of the year (light and hot/dark and cold) and spring and autumn make only together one such state (the moderate one), however they are seperated from each other and thus only half as long as winter and summer. I drew a graphic in MS Paint, so that my ideas can be seen and understood clearer (sorry, for my bad drawing talent):

So the year would basically consist of six parts and if we divided these parts (which would appear perfectly natural, since spring and autumn are already divided by the equinoxes), we would get exactly twelve months, which would roughly represent the ones of the modern calendar (only they would start and end about one week earlier, with the wintersolstice/yule/christmass as end of December for example). My father told me, that his grandmother used to say, that you can walk barefoot in months without an R in them (i. e. May, June, July, August, which would be exactly the four summer months of my calendar).

Further the seasons would represent the times of a day: Winter is the night (20:00 – 4:00), spring is the morning (4:00 – 8:00), summer is the day (i. e. forenoon and afternoon, 8:00 – 16:00) and autumn is the evening (16:00 – 20:00). This would also very well fit the ancient units of meassurement, introduced in Varg Vikernes’ book MYFAROG. If a year represents a day in the way I just described, then each of the thirds of a halfyear would represent a shift (4 hours) and every week would roughly represent a glass (half an hour).

I also know the Scandinavian Bronze Age calendar with 13 months of 28 days, known from a rock carving in Bohuslän and introduced by Varg Vikernes in his book Sorcery and Religion in Ancient Scandinavia as well as in MYFAROG, but I don’t think that this was the only calendar used in the ancient times and I am sure that this one was used too, simply because it would be so logical to do so (as explained above). In any case it would be a really logical explaination, why we have exactly twelve months as well as 12/24 hours and also why the number 12 in generell was pretty important in the past.

By the way, according to my calendar, summer will end this Saturday (22nd August) around midday. I wish everyone a good start into autumn!

Heill Máni, the god of autumn!

Impfungen – Sinn oder Unsinn? (Vaccines – Sense or Nonsense?)

With this post I just want to share a very interesting 2 hour long german lecture about vaccines by Anita Petek Dimmer.

A long forgotten realm II – Are dreams alive?

This is going to be a pretty long and very philosophic, psychologic, spiritalistic (and maybe revolutionary) post.

First some music

Let me start all this chronologically. A few days ago I started to read the german book “Schöpferisch Träumen – Der Klartraum als Lebenshilfe” by the psychologists and lucid dream researchers Paul Tholey and Kaleb Utecht. (I do not think that there is an english translation of it, but I am not sure 😦 anyway, you can read the german version online here.). Translated into English the title would mean “Creative Dreaming – The clear (lucid) dream as a possibility to help yourself with your life (literally: “as lifehelp”)”. I read this book, because the whole matter of lucid dreaming and of actively inducing and using them, reminds me very strongly of the pagan initiation ritual of travelling into the underworld to gain something for the real world, to improve yourself, to lose or weaken your bad characteristics and strengthen or gain good ones. This is exactly, what you can do with lucid dreams.

I will try to give a short description about the most important contents of the book. It is divided into eight chapters.

In the first chapter, the authors describe what exactly a dream is: It is your mind dealing with all sorts of conflicts that appeared while being awake. It is thus a communication between your counscious mind and your unconscious mind. This communication is however far from being direct. It is kind of translated (similar to myths, that also do not directly tell what they really mean). E. g. if you have a struggle with a certain person, who will not stop to controll and try to rule over you, you will probably dream of being imprisoned within a little room (that symbolises this person).

The second chapter explains the difference between a normal dream and a lucid dream. A lucid dream has all of these aspects:

1. You have the absolute knowledge that you are currently experiencing a dream.

2. You can directly influence the dream and you clearly know about this ability while dreaming. (e. g. fly or let things appear or go through walls or change the whole dream conditions like place and time, and you do not do this because the dream story randomly takes its course that way, but because you actively decide these changes and activities to happen.)

3. Your state of consciousness is not reduced. Everything feels like the real world.

4. Your senses function at least in the same way as in the “real world”, often even better. (i. e. clearer colours or sounds).

5. You can remember all things of your wake life, like you were awake.

6. You will remember the whole lucid dream when you are awake (and also in your next lucid dreams).

These are the basic aspects, there is however one alternative aspect, without which it will be a lucid dream anyway (if the six aspects above are fulfilled), but which will kind of complete the lucid dream and will enable you to use the full potential of them:

7. Already within the dream you realise the meaning of the dream through communicating with different elements of the dream and get thus to know what your subconscious mind tries to tell your conscious mind with the dream.

If we return to our dream with the prison symbolising the person who wants to controll you, this means that if you have established this 7th aspect of lucidity, you will not have to think about the dream and translate it to find out its meaning, but that the prison will within the dream turn to that person, whom you can ask about it and who will tell you the meaning, i. e. you will actively translate the dream while still dreaming and the dream will help you to do so (although it will also often try to hinder you from that, so that you have find a way to stop it from hindering you; you have to find and know the secrets/runes so to speak)

This second chapter also gives the information how you can induce, increase and improve lucid dreams. It is presented within 10 rules:

1. Ask your self several times a day if you are currently dreaming or not. This is the most important rule, because through this, you will  cultivate a habit to do so, and will eventually also do so while dreaming.

2. While asking yourself this critical question, imagine intensively that you are dreaming.

3. Also check if you have lacks of memory within the last few minutes or hours in your life (which is very common in dreams).

4. Ask the critical question always in situations that are characteristical for your dreams. (If you often dream about riding your bike, do it always when you ride your bike etc.)

5. Do it also in situations that are characteristical for dreams in generel. (e. g. at sudden changes of situations)

6. If you often dream about impossible things (like flying), imagine those things while asking the critical question.

7. When going to sleep think about going to have a lucid dream this night.

8. Keep a dream diary and try to concern yourself intensively with your dreams, e. g. try to remember as many of them as possible.

9. (When you are awake) plan to perform a certain action in your dreams. (Either something simple like rising your arm, or something more complex like ask someone something)

10. Have patience and pratice regularly, do not set a deadline though. (And do not stop practicing after reaching your first lucid dream)

The next two chapters are basically descriptions about the fact that you can use lucid dreams to fight nightmares. If you become lucid within a nightmare the dream will most probably change and lose its threatening character. You will be able to ask your dream (and thus your own subconscious mind) about the meaning of the dream and you will thus be able to fight the source instead of the symptom.

The fifth chapter deals about an alternative way to reach a lucid dream. It is also possible to reach a lucid dream with not becoming lucid, but staying lucid, i. e. while you go to sleep you let your body fall asleep, but stay conscious in mind. This is indeed possible but really difficult. The way to reach this is similar to meditation. It is very usefull, because you will instantly have a lucid dream, but it is also really hard, especially for beginners.

The sixth chapter is about a philosophic and psychologic concept called critical realism. The main ideas are, that there is a certain area within the brain which deals with your consciousnes and that your mind can be deceived. There are thus two worlds, the phenominal world (how you perceive everything) and the transphenominal world (how everything really is).

The seventh chapter is basically only a collection of reports of lucid dreams to show the different possibilities to use them. There are three main aspects. You can either use them to recognise yourself or rather your unconscious mind, or you can use them, to do whatever you want and thus to experience extreme enjoyments, or you can use them to train both physical and cognitive activities. The latter is proven to really have a high effect of training that will have consequences for the real world.

The eightth and last chapter is about the question, if dream figures have an own conscious mind. (which explains the title of this post) This question first seems very stupid and ignorant. All in all these dream figures actually do not exist. They are within our own mind and imagination, within our dream. They have no physical body and only exist within us. But let us remember what a dream actually is. Appearently it is our subconscious mind trying to tell us (our conscious mind) something. The question arises, if it is possible for a person to have more than one minds/personalities/consciousnesses, who are independent from each other (although there would be only one main consciousness, the conscious mind, amongst several others, the subconscious mind). This would make it rationally possible for a dream figure to have an own consciousness/mind and to think and feel for himself, it would still be one of our consciousnesses, but it would be independend from our main consciousnes (not in existence, but in the ability to think, feel and act for itself).

The book gave several examples of tests that lucid dreamers made that suggest something like this:

The dreamers often asked dream figures who stood/sat opposite of them to write something onto a sheet of paper and they wrote it like they wood write it in reality (i. e. it was reversed from the angle of the dreamer and he could not read it untill he turned the paper 180°). It was normally written in a totally stranger handwriting, neither belonging to the dreamer nor the person, the dream figure was symbolising, (whom the dreamer normally knew).

There were however far more impressive examples:

The dreamers asked dream figures to tell them a word that they (the dreamers) did not know. On of them told the dreamer that his relationship with his girlfriend is “Orlog”, and he told him it means “charme”. He looked it up and it was Dutch and meant “war”. The dreamer has never heared of this word before. Another dreamer did the same and was (within his dream) told by the author of the book (who is a pretty popular psychologist in germany, especially under lucid dreamers) following sentence: “I am Nirod.” Nimrod is a character of the babylonian mythology often equalised with Gilgamesh, who is said to have travelled into the underworld and also to have had lucid dreams. Another dreamer, who was a student of psychology, discussed with his colleagues if the christian saint Paulus maybe had lucid dreams and then when he had a lucid dream he asked a dream figure, an old man, to tell him a word he did not know and he angrily said “Ikonium. Remember this word good!” The dreamer had again never heard about that word before. He looked it up and Ikonium was an anatolian city, where Paulus was stoned because of his doctrines.

This last chapter was what impressed me the most, because something similiar happend to me yesterday. (When I haven’t read that chapter yet.) I have now kept a dream diary for 3 days and yesterday I had two dreams (none of them lucid naturally, since I am not yet this far and still a beginner). The first one was about me living with my girlfriend within a medieval castle. Suddenly my girlfriend gives me a sheet of paper with two Latin sentences on it. I cannot remember them, but I know that the first one had the verb constellation of “sire sire sire” which my girlfriend translated with “to be allowed to believe/think to believe/think”. She translated the second sentence either with “You shall seek that” or with “You shall not seek that”, I cannot remember, which one it was. I wanted to know if “sire” really meant something like that and looked it up at an online dictionary for german-latin, but it did not find the word, so I thought it would be not important and stopped thinking about it. Now after I read this last chapter, it came again into my mind and I suddenly realised that maybe it is another language than Latin and looked it up on Wiktionary. The result was that it was english and indeed a verb. It means: “(transitive, of a male) to procreate; to father, beget, impregnate” and it indirectly comes from Latin (over French) (from Wiktionary). The meaning of this dream is crystal clear if you know my current situation, namely that I have relationship problems and that I was intensively thinking about what I should do if my relationship will fail. Should I try to find another wife and thus hurt the principle of loyalty until death or should I stay alone for the rest of my live and thus not pass my genes on? This was, what bothered me the last time a lot. Now think about the latin message given to me by my girlfriend: sire – to be allowed to/ to think/to believe – to procreate/to father. “You shall/shall not seek that!” Too bad, that I cannot remember which of the two possibilities it was.

There was a second dream at the same night (= yesterday). This was a horrible dream. I have such dreams from time to time. I was in my room and lay on my bed. Everything is dark. I lie in the same way as when I woke up. Everything feels and looks like reality. It was indeed not reality but a dream though because I know (now at least) that the bed stood different. The door was a little bit open and I was alone. I could not move (save my eyeballs, my lungs and my vocal chords), not in the dream and not in reality. Suddenly I feel as if I would not be alone anymore, although I could not see anyone ore anything. I start to get extreme panic and start to scream, there is only the panic in my head and I can do nothing other than scream (I cannot move my lips, jars or tongue, which makes the screams sound even sicker). I screamed within the dream and also in reality and woke up everyone of my family, my sister in the room next to my room and my parents one floor below us (it was half four in the morning). After that I did not go to sleep anymore and I was in a bad mood at least until midday. At the evening I wondered if I should lock the door of my room and suddenly I remembered that I also wonderd if I should do this the day before and that I eventually did not lock it. Then I remembered that one of the main elements of the nightmare was the half open door, before I felt someone/something near me and started to panic. I have no idea if this could really be the meaning of this dream, but it would be a very locigal explaination. Although it would be strange and sadistic from my subconscious mind to give me such a terrible dream only because of such a little disagreement like locking the door or not.

I really think that we should concern ourselves more with our dreams, because appearently they let us enter a part of ourself that we are not able to enter under normal circumstances. Our dreams are a very special realm. A realm that has fallen under oblivion. We should conquer this realm back! Because it is our personal underworld.

Hail Hel! Hail Valhöll! Hail our dream world!

A long forgotten realm – the real meaning of Sorcery and dreams

Today I have read a very interesting article. I really encourage you to read it too and to watch the video which is linked there. I will nevertheless also describe myself, what is written and said there and why I find it so important.

The article is about lucid dreams. Lucid dreams are dreams, in which you suddenly recognise that you are actually sleeping and within a dream. The interesting thing with lucid dreams is, that you do not wake up, once you realise that you are within a dream, but the dream goes on, only it will not be a normal dream anymore. A normal dream is like a story that you experience, like a book, that you are reading, only that you really see, hear, feel, smell and taste the events, instead of just think and imagine them. You can however not directly influence these events, you can not while you dream decide that you want to dream something else and change the dream to another one. This is not possible in normal dreams.

In lucid dreams this is however possible. In lucid dreams you can e. g. fly, but not because you dream to fly for some reason, but because you actively decide to fly and you will be able to fly after deciding to do so. You can do whatever you want, you can be whereever you want, you can create whatever you want. Everything will be and happen as you want. Everything is possible.

Now lucid dreams happen very seldom and you will not be able to remember most of them when you are awake. (Personally I already had a few of them, but I doubt that it were more than 10 in my whole life so far – I am 21 years old) There are however certain techniques to induce or increase lucid dreams. These techniques are basically 2:

1. (When awake) try to often ask yourself the question “Is this actually a dream?” Your brain will get used to ask itself this question and will probably also do it when you are dreaming.

2. Try to do something outside of the normal realm of reality such as hovering above the ground or reaching through a wall.  Naturally it will not work, but the repetition will remind you to randomly try your test while you are dreaming.  If the test proves you are asleep then you can begin creating a new dream, start flying or go wherever your imagination takes you.

So far, go good, but what is the meaning of all this. It is certainly an awesome experience, but why is it of such an importance, that I feel the need of writing a post about it? The answer is, because you can actively train your brain, your mind and your spirit whit this. It may well be, that, when we still were pure Neanderthals, all our dreams were lucid dreams. Maybe this was the actual and main reason, why we are dreaming anyway. Imagine a natural lifestyle in the wilderness. You are experiencing a really dangerous situation, like meeting a cave bear and you survive this situation. The next time you sleep, you will dream about it and be able to train this situation to be better prepared next time, when it happens while awake. You could also do that beforehand, after someone told you and described to you a cave bear. The wonderful thing about this, is that there are absolutely no limits, you can dream (and thus train) each and everything. You can train, how to survive a meeting with a cave bear, how to use a bow or how to fight with a sword, but you can also train things that are only important to survive this modern age of madness, like being able to have social contact – even with strangers. Maybe this was one of the main things that made our Neanderthal ancestors so superior to us modern humans, the fact that their dreams were lucid (which is so far only a hypothesis by be though). They could prepare each and every thinkable situation in their dreams and could thus  far better cope with these situations in reality.

At this part I want to repeat the second technique to induce/increase lucid dreams:

Try to do something outside of the normal realm of reality such as hovering above the ground or reaching through a wall.  Naturally it will not work, but the repetition will remind you to randomly try your test while you are dreaming.  If the test proves you are asleep then you can begin creating a new dream, start flying or go wherever your imagination takes you.

So, you try/pretend to do something, that is actually not possible, which eventually enables you in some way, to make it indeed possible. Pretend to make real. I don’t know if you think what I think, but there is only one word coming to mind, that can describe this: Sorcery!

Maybe the main point (or one of various major points) of  of Sorcery in antiquity was exactly this: to enable us to do what our Neanderthal forebears could do by nature, having lucid dreams (within the realm of dreams and death).

Hail Hypnos! Hail Óðinn! Hail Hoðr!

Sol Invictus

First some music

Have you ever heared about the Carrington Event? It was the biggest observed solar storm so far. It happened in 1859. Telegraph systems all over the world stopped working, some of them even startet to burn… Polar lights were visible as far south as Italy, Cuba and Hawaii. Except for the massive problems with the telegraph system, there were no bigger consequences though.

So, this was in 1859, when the only kind of modern technology relying on electricity was the telegraph system. And now look at our world today. What would happen if there came a new carrington event today? It is very likely, that our planet would have no electricity for months. What would be the consequences? No lights at night. No fridge. More or less no heat in winter. Maybe no pure water. Nothing would work. Supermarkets will be bought empty, because people will panic, they won’t get new things, because they cannot be produced or transported. Gangs will plunder and loot. Most people will simply starve. Nuclear power plants all over the world will explode, because their cooling system does not work without electricity, meaning even more people will die. The damage will be so massive, that we won’t be able to rebuild all this, we will loose almost all if not all modern technology. We will live in a new Stone Age and we will be forced to return from a consumer society to a hunter-gatherer society, or at least to self sufficient agriculture, but there will be absolutely no way of holding on to modern consumerism, technology and civilisation.

Do you also want to know how likely such an event is to happen? Well, there has been a solar storm in July 2012, that was at least as strong as the one in 1859, maybe even stronger, which was not directet to earth though. If it had happened one week earlier though, it would have aimed directly to earth…

Researchers have probed very old pieces of ice and found out that such big solar storms on average happen more often than every 500 years. This means, that if we don’t stop to use modern technology (and in particular electricity) so excessive (and I don’t think we will), then our civilisation will most probably end in about 400 years.

Every end is a beginning though. Night ends with the beginning of a new day. Sun will rise at 4:00 in the morning and our present age is 3:30. A 7,000 year long period of darknes is about to end. We ran further and further away from nature, but nature will eventually outrun us. Like Icarus, we flew further and further to the sun, that seemed so warm, comfortable and bright, but now we are about to burn ourselves. We are within the last 5 % or so of this awful, sterile modern world of madnes, the world of plastic, of fast food, where almost all forests have been killed and replaced by grey cities. This age is almost over. Soon it will end. And it will end in total havoc. And after this havoc, life will eventually become normal again (not normal in the sense of life how we know it at the beginning of the 21th century, but normal in the sense of utterly natural, like 100,000 years ago). Hail to the coming havoc, even if it will bring much death and pain, it will still be a sunrise.

Hail Nature! Hail Sôwilus! Hail Ginnungagap!

Some music at the end

About vaccines and common sense

First some music

I would like to begin with a quote:

“There is no decision for vaccines, because decisions require knowledge, and who knows does not vaccinate.” – Dr. med. Fritz Roithinger

I absolutely approve this quote and I will explain why. There are uncountable theories on how malevolent vaccines are to the human body and probably also uncountable theories claiming they are good. I won’t deal with neither of those theories here though, because in my opinion common sense is already enough to be against vaccines.

What does vaccinating do according to the people who are pro vaccines? It protects you from getting sick. What do vaccines do according to the people who are against them? They destroy your immune system and result in the fact the you will always get sick.

The latter is obviously a bad thing. You get sick and you will not become better and healthier afterwards but you will become sick again. But would the first thing be better (which would although be very, very unlikely and which is most probably a lie to get the pharma industry money)? Well, you would never turn sick, you would have an artificial immune system. You would have one, but an artificial one. You would not even have the choice of becoming sick and strenghen your (natural) immune system through it, so that you will not become sick anymore next time. You would have a fake immune system. Further people who have genetically caused a very bad immune system and who would have died under natural circumstances will not become sick and will pass their bad genes on to their children. Through vaccines you do not anymore have to have a natural immune system to survive. Naturally this will end up in a far worse (natural) immune system of the whole human population, which will be very bad when the vaccines will eventually be gone…

If I cannot cope with a simple sicknes without being vaccinated, I do not want to cope with it, because nature has not programmed me to do so. If I did it anyway (through vaccines), I will only pass on my bad genes and harm my futre children.

Some music at the end

Hail nature!

The mathematical evidence of Eternal Return

First some music

Time repeats itself. You have already read this ages ago and you will do it again after ages will have passed. And here is the evidence:

I have always been fascinated by mathematics and because of this I often think about mathematical things. Recently I wanted to know if there is some kind of system behind the size of the angles of regular polygones (regular as in all angles have the same size and all lines between the angles are even and have the same size). I found out that the sum of the angles of a triangle is 180°. The sum of the angles of a square is 360°. The sum of the angles of a pentagon is 540°. So obviously it always gets 180° more. The size of the individual angles can be calculated simply by dividing the sum of the angles by the ammount of the angles. So every angle of a square has 90° because 360 / 4 = 90.

I wondered if I could also do this into the other direction. So the sum of the angles of a bigon would have 180° less than that of a triangle, i. e. 0° and the individual angles would therefore also have 0°, since 0 / 2 = 0. A regular bigon would therefore be two lines with the same size, which are placed on the same position. The two angles with 0° would be the ends of the lines. I went even further and calculated a monogon, which would have a sum of -180° (i. e. 180° because in geometry the minus only means “in the other direction”) and thus also the one angle would have 180°, since 180 / 1 = 180.

Now, how would such a monogon look like? It would have only one angle, so it would also only have one line. This line is perfectly even and still its end would be at the same point as its start (namely at the angle of the monogon). It would be even and only reach into one direction but still eventually return to its start (like if you go into the west further and further you will eventually return to your start coming from the east). This means that our whole space/universe is eternal into every direction. Eternal, but not infinite, because the line will still have a certain size (like the equator of planet earth has a certain size).

There could yet be another form of infinity of space. You can divide a metre into 100 centimetres and a centimetre into 10 millimetres. But can you do this infinitely often? I do not think so and here is why: There is an ancient paradox described by the greek philosopher Zeno of Elea, which is called the Dichotomy paradox: A runner wants to run from a certain point A to another point B. Before he can get there, he must get halfway there. Before he can get halfway there, he must get a quarter of the way there. Before traveling a quarter, he must travel one-eighth; before an eighth, one-sixteenth; and so on. So it seems as if it would not be possible, but we all know that it is possible. So, why is it possible? The answer can only be, because at a certain point you cannot divide the space further. Let’s pretend this smallest space unit would be a millimetre. Then he would not need to move half a millimetre before a whole millimetre, but he would simply move a millimetre within one smallest time unit (= moment) and then another millimetre. Our world is not analogue but digital.

You can do the same with time. Before a day passes by, half a day has to pass by and so on. So it seems as if it was not possible that time passes, but it does. Why? Because again there have to be smallest time units = moments, that cannot be divided further into smaller units.

What do we have now? A world with a finite size consisting of (a certain number of!) smallest space units. Further we have smallest time units (moments). Every moment the matter/information within the smallest space units moves/changes = time passes. Because of the finiteness of the space units (there is a certain number of them), there has to be a finite number of the combinations of the position of the matter/information within the space units and thus a finite number of moments. Every moment depends on the moment before it and determines the moment after itself. So what happens, if all possible moments have passed? They will start again, because every moment is followed and preceded by another moment.

Time has never started, time will never stop, time is not infinite but yet eternal, it will always repeat itself. Time is like a spinning wheel.

Hail Jǫrmungandr!

Humans are like Books: Eternal Rebirth / Is Death something sad?

This post is actually going to be two little posts within one bigger post. I chose to do this because their topics really stick together and the two posts should not be read without reading the other, but they are yet too different too make them one big post, so I simply make two single posts within one big post. This way they are still two posts, but will be read together.

Humans are like Books

I. Eternal Rebirth

Some background music

What comes after death?

Will we be gone immediately after death, like the atheists claim? Is there a paradise/hell, where we will live until the world ends, and will we be gone after that, like the jews/christians/muslims claim? Will there be a Nirwana, where we will live for all eternity after we were reborn a certain ammount of times, like the buddhists claim? Or is there something more logical? Maybe there is no such thing as death at all. Maybe death is just a form of sleep. Everyone who is awake at daytime will fall a sleep again in the evening. Everyone who sleeps in the night will wake up again in the morning. It is a eternal circle.

Who am I?

What defines me as a person and seperates me from e. g. my colleague at work? Is it what I perceive or perhaps what I remember? It cannot be what I perceive, because then I would not exist at night when I have a dreamless sleep, but I obviously exist even during that time. Is it my memories, that define who I am? Let’s pretend it was so. Would I, now at age 21, be the same person, that I was at age 5? The answer is no, because I cannot anymore remember all things I expierenced at that time and at that time I certainly did not have many memories that I have today, e. g. memories of something I did when I was 15, because I have not experienced it yet at that time. The common sense anyhow tells us that I am indeed still the same person, that I was with age 5.

I think who we are is how we are. Names, for example, are used to seperate different persons from each other. And what are names? They are descriptions, they describe how the bearer of the name is. Hermann -> the army man; Friedrich -> he, who is peaceful; Adolf -> the noble wolf; Björn -> the bear; -> Bernhard -> he, how is as strong as a bear; Widukind -> child/son of the forest; Karl -> man/free man; Siegfried -> victory and peace; Otto -> he, who is noble, et cetera, et cetera. In fact you can do this to every single name there is. You will not find one name of any language where this is not the case. Who/what we are is how we are. How can you seperate a bear from a wolf? You have to describe them. A bear is bigger, lives alone and is omnivore. A wolf is smaller, lives in packs and mostly eats meat. They are what they are, because they are how they are.

Who we are is how we are. But what defines how we are?

The answer is simple: Mostly our DNA. It defines both how you look and how you behave as a person. This can be seen very well with monozygotic twins. They almost always behave like their twin and they most often do everything together with their twin. It was even observed that monozygotic twins who grew up without knowing their twin had almost the same hobbies, jobs and originalities.

So, to come to a conclusion: What defines, who we are is how we are and what defines how we are is our DNA. You can easily shorten this sentence to: What defines, who we are is our DNA. But, wait, if our DNA defines who we are, aren’t we then basically the same persons as our parents are? And wouldn’t our parents be the same persons as our grand parents are/were? Of course I am not only the same person as my father is, because I have both the DNA of my father and my mother, so am a mixture of them. I am the unity of my father and my mother within one body.

I am my forebears. I am still who I was 500,000 years ago, I just cannot remember it anymore, but as described above memory does not equal personality/identity. I cannot remember all things I did at age 5, but I am still the same person. I cannot remember the experiences of my great grandfather, but I am still the same person.

It is indeed eternal rebirth. Your forebears, i. e. you, have died uncountably often in the past. And you are still here, you have been born once again. And you will die once again, without really vanishing from this world.

If you still disagree with this theory, simply ask yourself a few questions: Why are we breathing instincively? Because we would die otherwise. Why are we drinking water instinctively? Because we would die otherwise. Why are we eating food instinctively? Because we would die otherwise. Why do we procreate instinctively? Because we would die otherwise. Wait, why would we die without procreating, we can easily live a hundred years without procreating and we will die anyway after those hundred years, even if we had procreated? The difference is, that your children will still live and you instinctively know that you are your children and this is the reason why we are procreating in the first place.

What defines a book is not the material of which it is made, but the things that were written into it. If you have a book and write down it’s content into another, until then empty, book and then burn the old book, you will still have the same book, although you have just burned it. Our bodies are books and we, i. e. our DNA, are the contents of those books. To be immortal you only have to write down the contents of your book, i. e. yourself/your DNA, into a new book, i. e. you have to get children. Your book will still exist, i. e. you/your children will still live, after it has been burned, i. e. after you have died. We can live after we have died. We are immortal.

Hail Líf and Lífþrasir!

 

II. Is Death something sad?

Some background music

A few months ago my grandmother passed away. Of course she was burried on a catholic graveyard and with a catholic funeral. On this funeral there was something I found very strange: Everyone seemed to be pretty sad and quite a few people even started to cry. I personally did not shed one single tear.

So it seems that my grandmother’s death made these people, my relatives, sad, but it did not make me sad. Please do not get me wrong here though. It is not as if I had not liked her or as if I had no respect for her. I simply do not find that death is something sad, which makes me find it so strange that my other relatives find it so sad.

What is death really? Death is nothing more than the loss of a body. Who are we? Are we our bodies? No, what defines us is our DNA, which is of course a part of our body, but not only of one single body. To quote myself:

What defines a book is not the material of which it is made, but the things that were written into it. If you have a book and write down it’s content into another, until then empty, book and then burn the old book, you will still have the same book, although you have just burned it. Our bodies are books and we, i. e. our DNA, are the contents of those books. To be immortal you only have to write down the contents of your book, i. e. yourself/your DNA, into a new book, i. e. you have to get children. Your book will still exist, i. e. you/your children will still live, after it has been burned, i. e. after you have died. We can live after we have died. We are immortal.

My grandmother is not dead. She lives. I am her and I am living. I have not died. I simply stopped using one of my bodies, that grew too old. My book became old and used, but I have written down the content into a new book, and now the old book burned, but the book still exists.

I have shed not a single tear at the funeral of my grandmother, not because I did not like her or because I am not emotional, but because there is nothing sad at death. The old book was burned, but the content is still there written in a new book.

There is no such thing as an eternal death, a death that is the eternal and irreparable end of a soul. This kind of death was invented by the jews/christians/muslims and is like their god purely fictional.

“There is no death for the honourable. There is no end for the honourable. Only eternal rebirth” – Burzum

Death, how the christians imagine it:

Death, how I imagine it:

I think this might be the main difference between the abrahamitic religions and paganism. They have forgotten who they are. They do not know anymore that they are the same book as their parents. They think their parents are gone after death and will never return to earth, because they think that every book is different and independent from other books. They do not know anymore that they are themselves their forebears. They have lost their roots and their connection to the past.

HailaR WôðanaR!

Some music at the end

 

Looking into the Sky – Some Art by me

First some music

Today (or maybe the last few days) I drew a picture. I often do this, but usually I don’t tend to like them, but this one is different. I will explain my thoughts and the backgrounds after showing it to you.

Here it is:

Now, as you can see, it consists of four smaller scandinavian swastikas and one bigger basque cross, or lauburu (basque: four heads), which is a kind of round swastika where each of the four hooks/heads consists of one bigger half circle and two smaller ones.

Now to the meaning of the whole thing:

The hooks/heads of the lauburu stand for:

• Earth/Spring/Birth/East
• Fire/Sun/Summer/Life/South
• Water/Moon/Autumn/Dying/West
• Air/Sky/Winter/Death/North

The black background stands for the universe and the small white swastikas for the stars (that you see to, when you look into the universe at night, apart from the black background.).

Regarding the directions, you may have noticed, that I structured them in a pretty unconventional way, with east up and west down, but even if you would turn the paper 90 ° to the right, so that east is in the right and west in the left, it would appear that north would be down and south up, which may seem strange.

I will try, to explain, why I did this. I drew East on the upper side and west on the down side because the sun travels/falls from east to west and things tend to fall from up to down. But then north would be left and south would be right and here it is the other way. This is because I drew it not from the perspective of looking from the sky to the earth, but the other way: looking from the earth to the sky. Imagine lying on the ground face up, looking into the sky/stars, with your head in the east and your feet in the west. For you, up will be east, left will be south, down will be west and right will be north, just like in my picture.

So after all, the meaning of the picture can be put in following words: Our world is eternal, but finite, everything moves in circles and repeats, 4 is a special number in this regard, as there are 4 phases of life, 4 directions, 4 seasons, 4 main deities and 4 ancient elements etc.

Maybe the most important meaning is something else though: Do not only look to the ground, instead look into the sky or into the stars, to find knowledge. Or in a metaphorical sense: Do not trust dark mainstream ideas of the vast mass, but instead look into the stars, into the few little white lights within the big black mass. Do not believe in what you can easily find on the ground, in what you almost automatically get to hear, but become strong enough to raise your head to the sky and skilled enough to search yourself for the truth there and wise enough to decide if what you find there is true or not.

HailaR WôðanaR!